Skip to main content

Turkey Striking Back?


By Abu Anas

The Turkish armed forces struck a Syrian military government building yesterday, Wednesday, close to the city of Tal Abyad in the Syrian province of ar-Raqqa. This move came in retaliation to the shelling of the Turkish city of Akcakale, situated near the Syrian border, by Assad army loyalists earlier that day, which killed two women and three children.1 The Syrian government later apologized to the Turks through their UN representative as was confirmed by Turkey's Deputy Prime Minister, Beşir Atalay.2 Today, the Turkish parliament ratified a mandate that allows the government to undertake acts of war to secure Turkey's borders.3 The question at hand is: Will Turkey invade Syria due to this skirmish?

Turkey, alongside with the US, will create an excuse to intervene militarily in Syria if the Assad regime collapses or nears its collapse while the opposition still threatens its vital interests in the region. Turkey is a US ally, and will not invade Syria unless given the greenlight by it. The Obama administration is now going through presidential elections, so it will not engage in such a venture, and hence nor will Turkey. On a much closer look we see that the Turkish parliamentary mandate was indirect; granting permission for military operations in "foreign countries" instead of firmly enacting a response towards Syria specifically. In addition, Mr. Atalay clearly stated that, “This is not a war mandate. It is a measure for deterrence.3 

The shelling of the Turkish town by the regime was either intentional or a mistake. Assuming that it was a mistake, then domestic implications for the Erdogan government would explain this limited response. Mr. Erdogan’s party, the Justice and Development Party (AKP), has a coalition with the nationalists within parliament, any inaction on his part will render him as a weak leader who cannot secure Turkey's borders. Additionally, his parties' Islamist base is fed up with his lip service towards supporting their Muslim brothers in Syria. On the other hand, if this was intentional, then the Syrian government's objective would be to use such skirmishes to threaten widening the conflict into a regional one for the sole purpose of putting pressure upon Ankara due to its limited hosting of the Free Syrian Army. 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     However, The Assad regime knows very well that the US and its ally Turkey has been in support of a resolution to this conflict which will secure its future existence, and therefore, it will not risk escalating the regional tensions into an all-out war. Up and until the US reaches an arrangement which will continue to secure Syria within its hegemony and provide a safe exist to Assad and his family, Turkey will continue to block the transfer of necessary weapons to the rebels that prevents them from demolishing the regime.4

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/03/world/europe/turkey-syria-tension/index.html
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2012/10/04/Syria-apologizes-for-deadly-shelling/UPI-16611349332200/
http://www.todayszaman.com/news-294241-turkey-authorizes-military-operations-in-syria-says-no-intention-of-war.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syrian-rebels-backers-block-arms-cache-until-bickering-factions-unite-8191522.html
Image By World Economic Forum Copyright World Economic Forum (www.weforum.org) Photo by Serkan Eldeleklioğlu-Bora Ömeroğulları-Ozan Atasoy Edited by DsMurattalk [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran