Skip to main content

Members of the Indonesian Parliament Visit the Treacherous Usurper Jewish Entity

Central
Media office
H. 19 Sha'aban 1434
M. 2013/06/28
No:1434 AH/59
Press Release
Members of the Indonesian Parliament Visit the Treacherous Usurper Jewish Entity

A number of leaders from Indonesia have made a controversial visit to the usurper Jewish entity on the land of the Issra wal Miraj on 27th May through 1 June 2013. This delegation was led by Tantowi Yahya, member of Commission I, Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR). The visit was pre-arranged by the Australian-Jewish Association.
The visit was revealed by several local media including: Republikaonline; EraMuslim.com; PikiranRakyat.com; Tribunenew.com; Dakwatuna.com; Nasional.inilah.com and many others. Afterwards Israelhayom.com announced the secret meeting, Tuesday, 11 June, to visit the office of the Jewish entity's parliament known as the Knesset. They met with several members of the Jewish entity's parliament.
Tantowi explained that: "This invitation was filed related to the current peace initiative on American Indonesian initiative. As the country with the largest Muslim population, they felt it was important to invite representations from Indonesia. We met with the state officials, parliamentarians, the media, academia, NGOs and ordinary people".
This visit is a disgrace and serves only the interests of America and its allies.
1.   The visit is a betrayal of the Indonesian parliament and of the Muslims in Indonesia and Palestine and to the Muslims throughout the entire world for the following reasons:
a.   The first visit of an Indonesian parliamentarian from the largest Muslim country in the world did not happen by coincidence but according to a premeditated scenario, which was accompanied by major media representatives in Indonesia such as television and newspapers.
b.   It is clear that this visit was of strategic value to the Jewish entity as part of a conspiracy against Islam and Muslims for the future recognition of the Jewish entity by Indonesia.
c.   We therefore ask the Muslims in Indonesia to hold this delegation accountable for this visit; they should be investigated and severely punished to prevent and deter any further contact with the enemy state like the atrocious Jewish entity.
2.   This visit is haram according to Islamic law as its aim is the normalization of political and economic relations with an enemy state that exists upon occupied Muslim land.
3.   We call upon the Muslims to beware of deceptions and plots hatched by America and the Jewish entity to further strengthen the Jewish entity's illegitimate existence, and we remind the Muslims that the so-called Palestinian problem is the Ummah's problem and not only the Palestinian's dilemma and it can only be resolved with the army of the coming Khilafah, Inshallah.

The Central Media Office
of Hizb ut Tahrir
Hizb-ut Tahrir:
Central Media office
Address & Website
Al-Mazraa P.O. Box. 14-5010 Beirut- Lebanon
www.hizb-ut-tahrir.info
Tel: 00961 1 30 75 94 Mobile: 00961 71 72 40 43
Fax: Telefax
E-mail: media (at) hizb-ut-tahrir.info

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran