Skip to main content

The Future of Syria insha'Allah is the Rightly Guided Khilafah



In response to the report by CNN Arabic:
The Future, Allah willing, is for the Rightly Guided Islamic Khilafah State in Syria and in the Region, Whereas the Butcher Bashar and his Baath Party are Plunging into an Abysmal Place
On 25/2/2014 CE, CNN Arabic reported that the butcher Bashar, during his meeting with the leaders of the Baath Party in the capital Damascus without mentioning the date of the meeting, as saying: "The resilience of Damascus during a three-year crisis experienced by the country "was instrumental in the steadfastness of Syria"and that the city "differs from the world's capitals and is unique in preserving the Islamic and Christian heritage together," and added that the Baath Party has become stronger after the defections, and he considered it a "healthy state". He described it as "self-cleansed" and saw that the Baath Party is playing a key role in the "intellectual battle" inside the country, pointing out that the current crisis "produced hotbeds of extremism, and at the same time rejected the political Islam".
O Muslims in the blessed revolution of Ash-Sham: Here he is the butcher Bashar, the agent of the fierce America and the son of the unjust international community, appearing again with Satan's tongue, far from truth and spews it with his hatred of Islam and obscene words far from reality, wanting to confuse people in what has transpired and that no one disputes. Everyone now knows that the tyrant of Damascus no longer makes decisions for war or peace in his country. And that Damascus that he praises with songs remains occupied; and that these occupiers, Iran and his criminal thugs are the ones who maneuver its battle. Had they left him to his forces, he would have been a thing of the past... Everyone also knows that the Baath Party is but a filthy rag that the regime does not posses anything else to wipe with, if some had left it, then the filthiest of them remained. It is not subject to the process of "self-cleansing" as he said, but to a "refining process" until it becomes wholly filthy... As for Damascus, it is indeed the best of the cities on earth. But it is not by the testimony of the dreaded, but by the testimony of the master of the Messengers, Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم who said that about it and Al-Ghouta; which the murderer bombards day and night with no mercy on its people.
«فُسْطَاطُ الْمُسْلِمِينَ يَوْمَ الْمَلْحَمَةِ بِالْغُوطَةِ إِلَى جَانِبِ مَدِينَةٍ يُقَالُ لَهَا دِمَشْقُ، مِنْ خَيْرِ مَدَائِنِ الشَّام»
"The pavilion of the Muslims on the day of the battle will be in Ghouta near a city called Damascus, the best city in Ash-sham."
(Narrated by Al-Bayhaqi from Abu Dhardaa')
As for what he said that Damascus is "unique in preserving the Islamic and Christian heritage together," it is because of the tolerance of ruling by Islam, where Islam left non-Muslims for long centuries to practice their religion within the general Islamic system. And not because of his dictatorship that is the worst in the history of regimes at all levels. Moreover, we see that his praise for Damascus is only because of his fear of its people and not out of his love for them, because it would be his cemetery, and the cemetery of his secular Kaffir party and the invaders. Damascus will be the pillar of Islam, and a source of light, Allah willing. And Allah سبحانه وتعالى will make it the abode of Islam, which would respond to the aggressions from the world's countries, as tomorrow nears for those who await it.
As for his saying, "The current crisis has produced hotbeds of extremism, and at the same time rejected the political Islam". We say that he, and America, which he commits the most heinous massacres by its orders, and Russia, which ceaselessly plunges him deeper into fault, and the Iranian regime, the partner in the American aggression against Muslims from Afghanistan to Iraq to Syria now; we say that they are the source of the international terrorism and are engaged in the worst forms of intellectual and material terrorism against Muslims, in order to prevent them from establishing their project of the rightly guided Islamic Khilafah state that Allah willing, is closer to materialize than ever. This is by the testimony of his Foreign Minister, who stated: "And we know that those plan evil for Syria, and those demanding the establishment of the Islamic Khilafah state will not stop at the borders of Syria". Similarly, rather more than him the vindictive Lavrov who delivered repeated international warnings of a return of the Khilafah. So what failure does this imbecile is talking about, when political Islam in Syria is advancing in this manner that fills the hearts of its enemies with rage?
We are in Hizb ut Tahrir Wilayah Syria realize that America and its alliances and agents have gathered their schemes, and rallied their malice, and alerted their armies to support their tyrant agent, Bashar, until they find an alternative tyrant, who serves their interests and achieves their goals to prevent the establishment of the Khilafah through their wishful thinking, but their assumption will destroy them. Therefore the Khilafah will return, Allah willing, by the assertion of the verses of the Book and the Ahadeeth of Al-Mustafa صلى الله عليه وسلم in the hands of men who:
صَدَقُوا مَا عَاهَدُوا اللَّهَ عَلَيْهِ فَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ قَضَى نَحْبَهُ وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ يَنْتَظِرُ وَمَا بَدَّلُوا تَبْدِيلًا
"have been true to the contract they made with Allah. Some of them have fulfilled their pact by death and some are still waiting to do so, not having changed in any way at all."
(Al-Ahzab: 23)
فَسَيُنْغِضُونَ إِلَيْكَ رُءُوسَهُمْ وَيَقُولُونَ مَتَىٰ هُوَ ۖ قُلْ عَسَىٰ أَنْ يَكُونَ قَرِيبًا
"They will shake their heads at you and ask, 'When will it happen?' Say: 'It may well be that it is very near.'"
(Al Israa, 17:51)
Hisham Al-Baba
Head of the Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir Wilayah of Syria
Wednesday, 26th Rabii' II 1435 AH
26/02/2014 CE
No: I-SY-175-04-028


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran