Skip to main content

The Republic is an English Project Imposed on us in Lausanne

29th of October, Republic celebrations are carried out during this particular period when the aftershocks of the coup attempt are still felt, system discussions, internal conflicts, terrorist attacks, struggles, poverty and distrust still rule over peoples' lives. The Republic, allegedly build upon the people’s will, has been imposed on the Muslim population and has provided nothing but godlessness, poverty, chaos and tyranny. The Republic has been established by the local co-operators on the prerequisite of abolishing the Ottoman State and the Khilafah, it is an English project brought together in order to fight Islam and entrench secularism in Turkey. For the English demanded from Turkey after World War I its most valuable treasure, its pillar, that kept the Ummah united, the Khilafah, supposedly to liberate us. Appointed by Mustapha Kamal, Ismet Inönu was offered four secret terms for independence by the English Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs Lord Curzon in the Lausanne meetings. These were: the total abolishment of the Khilafah, exile of the Khalif, confiscation of all of the Khalif's property and establishing a state based on secularism in other words the Republic.
This treasonous agreement which no Muslim could accept, was heavily opposed by the members of the parliament. Because what Mustapha Kamal and Ismet Inönu would give to the English was what the Muslims fought for centuries, was priceless. But Mustapha Kamal who established the Republic through trickery, intrigue and force, stood and said in 29th of October in the parliament: "We have to change this system. And I have decided it to be a Republic which is led by an elected president". So like that the Republic was established and imposed upon the Muslims. However, the English did not sign the Treaty of Lausanne until the Khilafah was abolished on the 3rd of March 1924. Even this is enough to confirm that the establishment of the Republic and the abolishment of the Khilafah is related to Lausanne.
O Muslims! The Republic is not, like it is propagated to you, a system that gives the authority to the people. Quite the opposite it is established through force, imposition, trickery and intrigue. It is a system, rotten to its core, the English chose in order to implement their imperialist plans. We know the Republic from its Independence Courts, Takrir-i Sukun laws, from Sheikh Sait, from Atıf Hoja Iskilipii, from the Turkish Adhans, from the gallows erected on the city squares, from Keriman Halis who attended beauty contests, from the poverty, from godlessness and from the greatest lie of our time, democracy. The Republic is not a system established in Ankara in the parliament, it’s an English project imposed in Lausanne. We did not only lose land with agreeing to the Treaty of Lausanne, we lost something more important - our Khilafah that kept the Ummah standing and shielded the Muslims! The English did not only take our authority on Mosul in Lausanne. They took away Islam and the Quran from our lives by establishing the Republic and abolishing the Khilafah. Then why do you still look up to this rotten system? Democratic Parliamentary System and the Democratic Presidential System are both nothing but the variants of the secular Republic. The Muslims' real project is the Khilafah Rashidah (Caliphate) upon the method of the Prophethood that will soon be established. Then work for the Khilafah and support those who work for it.
Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

in Wilayah Turkey

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran