tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post6808570097799097333..comments2024-03-06T09:57:45.766+00:00Comments on Islamic Revival: Egypt's farcical presidential election makes a mockery of the sacrifices of the revolution and strengthens America's control over Egypt!Abualihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06643744851892252884noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-56140250577968904762012-07-01T00:14:59.560+00:002012-07-01T00:14:59.560+00:001. The texts to do with not revolting against the ...1. The texts to do with not revolting against the ruler as long as he establishes the salah is to do with the Khalifah who implements the Shariah they do not apply to the present day rulers of the Muslim world who are not Khulafah and are ruling by kufr systems. For a more detailed explanation of the texts please read: http://islamicsystem.blogspot.co.uk/2007/08/when-is-rebellion-against-khalifah.html<br /><br />2. The da'wah carriers are not hiding in caves and are working openly according to the Prophetic methodology to convince the people throughout the Muslim world including in Egypt, Syria, Tunisia, Pakistan, Indonesia, etc. To see videos of this open work throughout the world see the following youtube channels:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/user/AhlNussrah<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/user/AhlNussrahIslamic Revivalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17200512096222987160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-63919332930866238912012-06-29T03:27:25.092+00:002012-06-29T03:27:25.092+00:00The people are now talking that we should not figh...The people are now talking that we should not fight and revolt against a ruler as long as he establishes prayer and claimming that if the carriers of dawah were doing thir job why couldn't they convince people especially when people are calling for Islam . Either the muslims who were calling for Islam weren't sincere in their understanding about Islam or the Dawah carriers who are calling for Khilafah couldn't convince th people with their self understood ideology and hiding in caves and working is not fruitful for doing it we have to be open it in society although citing the example from seerah of working in secret can be used to defend your stance but practically its called again compromising.<br /><br />Please enlight on this responseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-29894810696706221132012-06-28T14:37:49.046+00:002012-06-28T14:37:49.046+00:00Please elaborate the difference between Sharah Law...Please elaborate the difference between Sharah Law and Shariah Intent as the MB' advisor quoted in the interview.What did he actually mean oover there and what Islam says about Sharia Intent as to where and when it should be used and how.<br /><br />JZk!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-92003552581930202472012-06-27T02:41:55.555+00:002012-06-27T02:41:55.555+00:00Watch TV interview with an adviser to Muslim Broth...Watch TV interview with an adviser to Muslim Brotherhoods Freedom and Justice Party says, "We do not believe in the rule of religion (i.e Islam) over the civility of the state" and he continues to say "we do not believe in the translation of the religions texts over the civil laws and the secular laws of the state".<br /><br />http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/hardtalk/9731829.stmIslamic Revivalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17200512096222987160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-80186866024896901042012-06-27T02:35:53.194+00:002012-06-27T02:35:53.194+00:00If you understand Arabic you can see his TV appear...If you understand Arabic you can see his TV appearances for yourself for example:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRZ6VphJrXE<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AAO2leT9g0<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGzCKclRuVkIslamic Revivalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17200512096222987160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-80908649543050755492012-06-27T02:23:53.167+00:002012-06-27T02:23:53.167+00:00Assalam wa alaikum,
1. What you said about us no...Assalam wa alaikum, <br /><br />1. What you said about us not having first hand information is not correct:<br />- We have the first hand information from Dr. Mursi's own statements and speeches available in Arabic on the websites of Ikhwan as well as some video recordings of his own interviews. <br />- The da'wah carriers for Khilafah in Egypt have been interacting with the members of ikhwan for decades and know them well, some of them were imprisoned together. They are holding a Khilafah conference in Cairo soon, see: http://islamicsystem.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/khilafah-conference-to-be-held-in-cairo.html<br /><br />2. Don't be duped by Dr. Mursi's statements about implementing the shariah. We saw the same from Dr. Hasan al-Turabi in the past from Ikhwan who became the president of Sudan, did he implement the Shariah and establish an Islamic state? We have seen such rhetoric from many 'Islamic' parties and leaders in the past who raise the sentiments of people but do not deliver. <br /><br />3. Let's actually look at Dr. Mursi's own statements and you will see in the coming days his disappointing actions and do not be surprised by these. <br /><br />Ikhwan says on its own English website: http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=30137<br /><br />About his recent speech: "The speech addressed the peace plan with Israel, spoke well of the military establishment, with respect and moderation about the Police Foundation, and was friendly with regard to all sectors and classes and governorates across Egypt".<br /><br />Peace with Israel is completely different to the Prophet's treaty with the Quraysh. Makkah at that time was not an occupier of Islamic land thus the evidence proves that having such a treaty is allowed, e.g. a non-permanent treaty with North Korea for the Khilafah in the future would be fine. It is unanimously agreed that having a treaty with an occupier of Islamic land like Israel is definitively haram, for more details on Islamic rules of treaties see: http://islamicsystem.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/treaties-in-islam.html <br /><br />This is only one example there are many clear cut issues such as:<br />- The democratic form of government that opposes Islam from its basis<br />- Continuing the Riba based banking system and economy <br />- Continuing the western social system and not enforcing the Islamic laws of dress code and segregation between the sexes, see: http://www.fjponline.com/article.php?id=782<br /><br />There are many other examples. <br /><br />So as you see it is not just speculation and analysis it is based on the stark reality in front of everyone's eyes to see.Islamic Revivalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17200512096222987160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-7610680676859533382012-06-26T20:28:46.701+00:002012-06-26T20:28:46.701+00:00Asalamalikum.
I truly understand you are not pass...Asalamalikum.<br /><br />I truly understand you are not passing takfeer on a muslim brother by considering the kufr being at minimum, The confusion being and been asked often is we cannot judge the matters based on media reports like what Al arabiya reported that “What Mursi said today was a pledge that he will not implement Sharia and that the state will be democratic and constitutional,” Ismail added. <br /><br />Now on other hand you have a media report that Muslim brotherhoods Dr.Mursi saying took pledge as Abu Bakr did and another report says Egyptian Cleric Safwat Higazi: Muslim Brotherhood Presidential Candidate Will Liberate Jerusalem.<br /><br />So everything is spoken by media so the common Ummah is so tired of media to take things and how do we explain the ummah who is thirsty for shariah for years now that what MB is calling for is not Dar Al Islam but a repetitive of what we had confined to our borders.<br /><br />More importantly when you talk about the treaty with Israel the treaty with Quraish is brought into consideration<br /><br />2. In an attempt to explain Ummah by sincere efforts that Prophet saw didnt compromise citing the example from seerah where is stood firm by saying if you put sun in my right hand and moon in my left hand i wont stop.<br /><br />The Ummah asks does this hadith is only for mursi or all.<br /><br />In midst of all how should Ummah believe in political reality which is being presented to them and reconcile between which analysis being true . <br /><br />As you dont have any first hand information why to misguide Ummah with mere speculation about political reality based on media news and Why other scholars of Islam not speaking against it,You guys need to think outside the box apart from being rheoric and just slogans could also be the possible reaction by Ummah no matter how many sacrifices you give for Deen of Allah and rely always on his help to safeguard his Deen.<br /><br />Hoping your Opinion about this concern.<br /><br />Your Brother.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-82090807171354446502012-06-26T02:27:51.723+00:002012-06-26T02:27:51.723+00:00Wa alaikum as salam
The rules of Huzn az-Zann and...Wa alaikum as salam<br /><br />The rules of Huzn az-Zann and back-biting do not apply to the one who does not rule by whatever Allah has revealed. The one who does this is a fasiq (open sinner) at a minimum. <br /><br />Allah (swt) says:<br /><br />“And whoever does not rule by what Allah has revealed, they are the disbelievers” [Al-Ma'idah, 5:47]<br /><br />Surah al Maida verse 44:<br /><br />وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ<br />“And whosoever does not rule by what Allah has revealed then such are the kafireen (disbelievers) ”<br /><br />The renowned scholar Ibn al-Qayyim said: "The correct view is that ruling according to something other than that which Allah has revealed includes both major and minor Kufr, depending on the position of the judge. If he believes that it is obligatory to rule according to what Allah has revealed in this case, but he turns away from that out of disobedience, whilst acknowledging that he is deserving of punishment, then this is lesser Kufr. But if he believes that it is not obligatory and that the choice is his even though he is certain that this is the ruling of Allah, then this is major Kufr." [Madaarij as-Saaliheen, 1/336-337]<br /><br />Mursi has not established an Islamic government that implements the Shariah of Allah. So he is ruling by other than whatever Allah has revealed and therefore matches the description mentioned in this verse of the Quran of an open sinner at the minimum. <br /><br />The scholars permitted backbiting for six reasons: to complain, in seeking help to change a munkar, seeking a legal verdict, warning Muslims of evil, which is considered naseehah, mentioning the sin of the one who openly commits sins and to introduce someone. An-Nawawi said in his al-Azkaar ‘in the majority of these cases there is agreement that backbiting is allowed.’ He said: ‘their evidence is clear from the sahīh and mashur hadīths.’ He reported this in his Riyadh as-Saliheen where he mentioned some of the evidences. As-Sanaa’i also mentioned the evidences in Subul as-Salaam. Al-Qarafi sad in az-Zakhīrah: ‘Some scholars exempted 5 things from the prohibition of backbiting and they are as follows: advice (an-Naseeha), disparagement and attestation (jarh wat ta’deel) of witnesses and hadīth narrators, those openly committing sins, people who commit innovation (bid’ah) and write misguiding books and when the one who says backbiting and the one who hears it, both knew of the subject of backbiting’ <br /><br />There are many other verses in the Quran ordering us not to deviate from ruling and judging by the laws of Allah. <br /><br />فَاحْكُمْ بَيْنَهُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ ۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعْ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ عَمَّا جَاءَكَ مِنَ الْحَقِّ<br /><br />"So judge between them by what Allah has sent down and do not follow their whims and desires deviating from the Truth that has come to you." [Al-Ma'idah, 5:48]<br /><br />What you mentioned about alcohol being prohibited gradually is a common misconception and is incorrect as it contradicts the Islamic evidences, the following article clarifies this: http://islamicsystem.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/refutation-of-gradualism-tadarruj.html<br /><br />Instead of inventing the methodology for changing the situation of the ummah from our own minds we need follow the shariah methodology based on the Islamic evidences, even though it is difficult the Prophet (saw) did not establish the Islamic state without difficulty and never compromised with the Quraish despite all their attempts.Islamic Revivalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17200512096222987160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19500355.post-24734903529294025832012-06-25T19:59:26.080+00:002012-06-25T19:59:26.080+00:00How do we respond to a person who would have Husn ...How do we respond to a person who would have Husn az zann about MURSI.<br /><br />Women's right and working with Cgristians is part of Shariah anyways. So is freedom of expression for that matter.<br />So the problem is not Mursi and what he said, as what he said did not go against ruling according to Shariah! The problem is the way the media make things seem (like in this article by Al-Arabiya) that women's rights, freedom of speech and working alongside others than Muslim is automatically made to appear to be against Islam and by this the media makes Islam look intolerant!<br />Look how the Muslim empires, or even the time of the 4 khulafa or even the Prophet himself dealt with things such as WOMEN RIGHTS, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND WORKING ALONGSIDE NON-MUSLIMS!!!<br />As for his choice of words (democratic and the like). Let us just wait and see what will happen. After all, he is a a very tough position and we should NOT judge our brother too soon. <br />We should also remember the treaty the prophet went through with Quraish and all the things that "seemed" against Islam and Muslims. Who knows what Mursi's plans are in the end. But let us give him the benefit of the doubt inshallah.<br />He will definately be better that the idiot before him (Husni Mubarak) inshallah, and as for the choice between him and Shafeeq, there is no question that the better for justice has won.<br />Islam is first and foremost about justice and rights in terms of governing the people, let us not forget that. So instead of everyone just backbiting our fellow Muslims (as usual) let us wait and see what his actions do. After all, he has to implement the changes slow and strategically. He has to be realistic. Islam is a realistic Deen and things take time and Islam does teach to take things in stages to accomodate the people (hence the Quran came down in a period of 23 years, and alcohol was also prohibited gradually...etc)<br /><br />May Allah give Mursi strength and may he turn Egypt at least more towards shariah than it previously was. After all, the US and Israel know they will have it a bit tough with him now. Especially Israel.<br /><br />We all also know that he does NOT have full power over egypt as well. He needs to play his cards right. Give him some time brothers. Why so quick in judging just when you hear things that you do not agree with?<br /><br />No disrespect to anyone, just speaking my mind and my thoughts.<br /><br />Salamu Alaikum :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com