Islamic Revival

Question: Assalaam Alaikum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakatahu May Allah grant you His forgiveness and good health, I have two questions, the first one: It is known that Omar Ibn Al-Khattab (ra) kept the land of Iraq and refused to distribute it to the fighters, the question is: Is this an Ijtihad of Omar Ibn Al-khattab (ra) which others may hold a different Shariah opinion, or is it a consensus of the companions which is prohibited to differ with? The second question is: land in the Islamic state is either classified as a Kharaj or ‘Ushr. Kharaj as defined in the book  Funds in the Khilafah State  as: the right of the Muslims imposed on the land that is conquered from the Kuffar, either by the use of force or by peaceful means, it would thus be a Kharaj of force and a Kharaj of peace. And ‘Ushr is what is taken from the produce of ’Ushri land of a Muslim and it is Zakat and is given for specific categories decided by the Shar’. The question is: in a land where its inhabitants

Question: Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuhu my dear respected brother. I became confused on two matters for which I would like you to please clarify them, may Allah سبحانه وتعالى reward you with all good and help you. The first matter is related to the Zakat on secured paper currency. It is mentioned in the book  “Funds in the Khilafah State”  that the representative paper currency is treated the same as gold or silver because it represents either gold or silver. This is clear. It is also mentioned that Zakat on compulsory paper currency is obligatory because it is linked to the currency  ‘Illah,  and its value is evaluated with gold or silver depending on its purchase value in the market and its Zakat is calculated after the  Nisab  and the passing of one year. This is also clear. As for the “reliable paper currency” which has a specific cover of gold and silver according to a specific proportion which is less than the nominal value of currency as determined by the St

Political deception: Its reality and its effect upon the Ummah Hasan Hamdan 25/03/15 The means and styles utilised by the disbelievers in their war against the Muslims have varied since they dealt a decisive blow against their political entity: ‘The Khilafah’. They killed that tender mother leaving her sons afflicted by a great loss and so they lost their political caretaker. Then in order to prevent the Muslims from being able to restore the authority of Islaam and to stop the return of its State the disbelievers found themselves in the greatest need of deceiving and misdirecting the Muslims. This was so that they would not tread the correct path which would lead to change and so the West utilised a wide range of political means and styles to prevent the return of Islaam. Political deception represents the most dangerous of these means. The reality of political deception is to conceal the political truth (or its true reality), to blot it out and make others blind to it by makin