Islamic Revival

  Central Media office H. 19 Rabi' II 1434 M. 2013/03/01 No: 1434 AH /25 Press Release The Jewish Karimov Renews his War against Allah and against Hizb ut Tahrir Prosecutes Mohammad Amin Wedilshod along with other Hizb ut Tahrir Members! (Translated) Karimov, the enemy of Allah, the butcher and killer, along with his thugs, militias, intelligence services, jailors and others like judges and prosecutors, have renewed their war against Allah and the members of Hizb ut Tahrir, the courtrooms of Uzbekistan are being held day after day to declare their war against Allah (swt) through the prosecution of His allies. They sentenced Mohammad Amin Wedilshod and other members of Hizb ut Tahrir in Andijan, who were all among those working for the establishment of Allah's ruling on His land over His servants. This tribunal was held after a long period of torture, abuse and brutality where members of Hizb ut Tahrir in investigation cells faced pressure to re...

  Central Media office H. 17 Rabi' II 1434 M. 2013/02/27 No: 1434 AH /23 The  Defection of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and the Saud Clan from the Ottoman Caliphate Dear Administration of the site: "Islam Question and Answer" Assalamu Alaykum wa Rahmat Allahu wa Barakatu, You published on your site an answer to the question titled,  "Did the Sheikh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab  defect from the Ottoman Caliphate, and was he a cause of its downfall?"  and the answer quoted from the book:  How the Khilafah was Destroyed  by the Scholar Sheikh Abdul-Qadeem Zalloum. We found a number of important points that need to be clarified, and we hope you will kindly publish our comments regarding the answer on your site... May Allah award you a great reward on our behalf. Othman Bakhash Director of the Central Media Office  of Hizb ut Tahrir ------------------------------------------ Bismillah ar-Rahman ar-Raheem...

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled recently in favor of upholding a Quebec law which states that there is no support for common law partners upon separation. The ruling came as a result of a vote between 9 judges, with 5 in favor of upholding the rule and 4 against. The significance of this ruling lies at the foundation of its legal framework, which is that man is the source of legislation. This case begins with the notion that sexual relationships outside of marriage are normal, which, as a result, require the courts to deal with the consequences of breakups in such relationships. It is naturally expected that justice results from any governing system, especially at the judicial level. This recent case provides a startling example of how laws are struck down or upheld by a mere vote.  The Supreme Court decision goes to show how man-made legislation can vary with profound implications on a major social pillar of society, the family, simply as a result of a difference o...