Skip to main content


Showing posts from August, 2013

The American Led International Coalition to strike Syria Aims to Impose its Rule and Save Bashar

The American Led International Coalition to strike Syria Aims to Impose its Rule and Save Bashar, and Hit the Islamists and Prevent the Arrival of the Islamic Project to Power The American position has announced the decision to punitively strike the Syrian regime after Bashar made use of chemical weapons against civilians in Damascus on 8/21/2013 surprised the countries of the world. Some of these countries took a supportive position, declaring their willingness to join the international coalition that is to direct this strike under the lead of America. The wave of regional and international media undertook a change of direction, such that the talk about this intervention is the first topic that is making the round. Obama has described the chemical attack as  "an important event that raised grave concern",  announced America's intention to launch a military strike against strategic targets in Syria and opposed the call for military intervention in Syria without a

Nusrah: Is it sought or is it formed?

In recent days there has been much discussion about the subject of seeking the Nusrah and especially after the revolutions that have become known as the Arab Spring in general and the revolution in the lands of Ash-Shaam specifically. The following idea and question has been circulating amongst the general Ummah including some of the Shabab who carry the Da'wah: Why does the party bloc which is the most aware in matters of the Shar'a (Islamic legislation) and most aware politically insist upon the issue of seeking the Nusrah? And why does this bloc not establish and form a specific force that can be utilised relying upon it to reach the position of ruling? And why does it not form armed regiments and brigades in the land of Ash-Shaam so as to become the nucleus of the army that establishes the Islamic Khilafah? All of this is especially so particular so as this is the only block that is spread throughout the whole world whether in the Islamic or non-Islamic world, across the

The Saudi King spends millions to fight against Islam

News agencies have reported that the Saudi King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz intends to donate $100 million to the United Nations to support the 'Centre of combating' what they call 'Terrorism'. In a speech given by the King on the occasion of Eid ul-Fitr he said:  'I announce the giving of $100 million to support the work of this centre operating under the Umbrella of the United Nations'.  This was according to the Saudi News Agency and in addition the King called the 'International Community' to support the 'Centre' to get rid of what he called: 'The forces of hatred, extremism and criminality'. And prior to this Saudi had signed an agreement with the UN in the year 2011 to establish this 'Centre' and gave an amount of $10 million for its creation. And it is worth noting that the King of Saudi himself was the original owner of the idea to create this centre. He suggested it first in 2005 and made combating 'terrorism'

Threatening Military Intervention in Syria is to prevent the rule of Islam and produce an alternative agent to Assad

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Threatening Military Intervention in Syria, Which is Increasingly Talked About, is the Epitome of Evil It is to prevent the rule of Islam and to produce an alternative agent to rule instead of their agent Bashar after his role is exhausted Currently the circulating talk of military intervention by America and its allies under the pretext of their opposition to the use of chemical weapons by the regime is escalating. They shroud that under "defending humanism and morality" while they are devoid of this. America, Britain, France, Russia and all Kafir colonial states have for so long trampled all humanitarian and ethical values with their feet in the prisons of Bagram, Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib. Not to mention their flagrant spying! They are infamous for competing in nuclear and biological crimes, weapons of mass destruction and monstrous massacres. Evidence of this is scattered in all corners of the world, from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to the terribl

Q&A: The Hukm (ruling) of Women who Participate on the Battlefield & Relationship of the Islamic State with Belligerent States

(Translation) بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Question: Assalamu alaikum to my brother, Sheikh and Ameer. 1. In a discussion I had with one of the Shabab, we disagreed in regards to the women in the situation of war. Does the Hukm (ruling) of the women that go out to the battle field to encourage the army apply upon them or does the Hukm of Asraa' (captives/prisoners of war) apply to them whilst acknowledging that today there are women fighters like men in terms of carrying weapons, using aircraft, artillery or participate in naval warfare.... 2) The following was stated in the publication of Introduction to the Constitution of the Khilafah State, (Mashroo' Dustoor Dawlat ul-Khilafah) in the fourth point of Article 188: "(In regards to) the actual warring states like Israel for example it is obligatory to take with it the state of war as the basis for all actions and dealings just as if we are in an actual war with it and this is whether a Hudnah (truce) exist

Q&A: The meaning (making my own Ijtihad) According to the Scholars and Mujtahideen

(Translation) بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Question: The book The System of Islam states: [Thirdly: If there is an opinion which is intended to unify the Muslims for their own good, then it is allowed for the Mujtahid to leave the result of his Ijtihad, and to take the judgment that intends to unify the Muslims, as happened with 'Uthman (R.A) when he was given the Bay'ah.] End And the following is stated in the book The Islamic Personality Volume I: (Fourthly: If there is an opinion by which it is intended to unify the Muslims for their own good, then it is allowed for the Mujtahid to leave the result of his Ijtihad, as happened with ‘Uthman (ra) when he was given the Bay'ah as Khalifah. It has been reported about 'Abdur-Rahman b. 'Awf (ra) that, after he consulted the people individually and together, in secret and openly, he gathered the people in the mosque, ascended them to the minbar and made a long supplication. He then called 'Ali (ra), held his hand a

Q&A: Does the Hadith (thani athuboot) Reach the Rank of Mutawatir on the Grounds that Part of it has Taken Place

(Translation) بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Question: Assalamu Alaykum wa Rahmat Allahu wa Barakatu, there are speculative Ahadith (thaniyya athuboot) that we use as proof when we interact with people to spread the idea of Islam when we herald the tidings of Allah's Prophet (saw) such as the Hadith: «تَكُونُ النُّبُوَّةُ فِيكُمْ مَا شَاءَ اللهُ أَنْ تَكُونَ... ثُمَّ تَكُونُ خِلَافَةً عَلَى مِنْهَاجِ نُبُوَّةٍ» "Prophethood will last among you for as long as Allah wills...  Then there will be a Rightly Guided Khilafah upon the ways of the Prophethood." The question: This Hadith is speculative and speaks about the political conditions that will pass on the Ummah, and one of the meanings of the Hadith is that the Prophet divided the conditions into five conditions (the Prophethood - Rightly-Guided Khilafah - biting rule - oppressive rule - Rightly-Guided Khilafah), so when we see that four fifths of the Hadith have fallen on the Ummah, does this not promote this

Q&A: Reality of Iran in relation to US Policy

Question: What is the reality of Iran in relation to U.S. policy? In other words, does Iran follow its own project in the region, independent from America? Can we say that Iran has a message to spread in the region, namely the Jaafari Madhab? Finally, what is America's actual position towards Iranian nuclear weapons? Answer: To answer that we have to briefly review the reality of the Iranian regime and the course of its politics since the outbreak of the revolution and the proclamation of the Republic and finally the relationship of all of that with America: 1. The American role in the Iranian revolution was obvious from the very beginning.  During Khomeini's stay at the Neauphle-le-Château in France, he was visited by delegates from the White House with Khomeini agreeing to cooperate with America. Consequently American newspapers reported about the agreement and the meetings that took place there... These facts were recently revealed by the first president of the Repub