This is the translation of the Answer to a Question asked to Shekh Ata'a Bin Khalil Abu Rashta, The Ameer of Hizb Ut Tahrir There are those who say that Hizb ut Tahrir depends on the period of Mecca in its quest for the establishment of the Khilafah and not on the period of Medina. It views material action, i.e. "Jihad" in the stage of calling for the establishment of the Khilafah as a violation of the Shari'ah, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم has not done so... The questioner adds: Why is the evidence of the establishment of the Khilafah not taken from the Medinese period, where Jihad was valid and applied? Is there a clear-cut sufficient answer to the issue? Wa jazak Allahu khairan. Answer: Within this question lie several matters that require explanation: 1. The relevant evidence, whether from the Book or from the Sunnah, must be followed comprehensively, and there is no difference between the evidence emerging in Mecca al-Mukar...
"Thoughts are the greatest wealth of any nation."