Islamic Revival

It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa'id that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: On the Day of Judgment there will be a flag for every person guilty of treachery. It will be raised in proportion to the extent of his guilt; and there is no guilt of treachery more serious than the one committed by the ruler of men. [Muslim] What could lead a ruler to betray his nation? Cause huge damage to the security of his country, sell out Kashmir, kill its citizens with its own army, humiliate the architects of its nuclear programme and disappear its sons? What kind of ruler could seek to look after the needs of other nations whilst his own suffers? What kind or ruler could have great sympathy for Western nations and show little for his own? This type of ruler is an agent, in Pakistan this man is called General Pervez Musharraf. Muslims are increasingly sensing the reasons that allow agents like Musharraf to rise to power. Corrupting the Elites The kafir colonialists unders

Check out this excellent article: http://the-dhimmi.blogspot.com/2007/05/dhimmi-non-muslims-living-in-khilafah.html

The following is a translation from Arabic. Question: Can wife take money forcibly from a miserly husband without permission of state or husband? Can this be a proof for individual taking rights forcibly from kaafir state? Answer: It obligatory on the man to provide nafaqah for his wife. If he is a miser and does not spend on his wife then it is allowed for his wife to take from her husbands wealth without permission that amount which is enough by custom (bil-ma’roof) for her and her children. The evidence for that is what Bukhari narrated on the authority of ‘Aisha that Hind the wife of Abu Sufyan said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, indeed Abu Sufyan is a miserly man. He does not provide me with the maintenance that my children and I need except what I take from him without his knowledge.’ He (saw) said: ‘Take that which suffices you and your children in a fitting manner (bil ma’roof).’ As for when you have a financial right from the state, such as if the state usurped your wealth or confis

To download the Urdu inpage file of the open letter to lawyers in Pakistan from the workers for Khilafah there go to: http://www.esnips.com/doc/c59e8d47-6d99-4892-8587-37479688739c/Open-letter-to-lawyers-in-Pakistan

The following is a translation from a recent Arabic political analysis Q&A. Question: The Darfur issue continues to remain hot and intensify, especially of late. Is Darfur becoming a region similar to the separated southern Sudan? Or is it different, will it simply be given more administrative powers and remain part of Sudan? What has happened to the issue of International forces with the African forces, which was raised in various statements and conferences, the last of which was the Darfur conference held in Libya on 28th April, 2007 C.E. Answer: (We have dwelt at length on the subject of Darfur in reply to a question on 28th July, 2004 C.E.) The Darfur issue is different in certain aspects from the issue of southern Sudan. The situation of southern Sudan is that it is discussed as a separate territory independent from Sudan to serve as base for the United States for political and military purposes in Africa. In other words, America is not content with having its agents as ruler

The following is a translation from Arabic. The German Interior Minister Wolfgang Shoelbe on the second Wednesday of May 2007 C.E called for an Islamic Conference for the second time where 15 delegates represented the Muslims and another 15 represented Germany with the purpose of discussing ways to integrate Muslims in Germany. The apparent aim was to assist Muslims residing in Germany to integrate and carve a German Islam. This is how the interior minister declared in the conference when he said: “….and to improve the mutual coexistence between Muslims and majority of the society”. Before we begin to delve into the agenda of the conference and its aims, we would like to disseminate the interior minister’s inaugural speech addressed to the Muslims in the Islamic World. This was not objected to by the so-called Muslims’ representatives in the least; on the other hand, in the context in which he expressed his well-veiled views, these representatives were filled with a sense of satisfacti

The following is a translation from a recent Arabic political analysis Q&A. Question: It has been observed in the aftermath of the Democratic Party’s victory in the mid-term elections to the US Congress (Senate and the House of Representative), there is an apparent shift in the style of them addressing the Middle East Conflict concerning Palestine, as well as towards Iraq. This was marked during the visit of Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives visit to the region. It is also evident from the stand taken by the Democrats on the funding of the Iraq war. Does all this mean that a definite shift has taken place in the US policy for the region? Answer: Countries like the US have an institutionalised policy-making apparatus in place and they do not indulge in ad-hoc, off-hand and short-term policy making. Their policies, especially the broader policies and fundamental frame works are adopted after exhaustive studies and due contemplation, therefore, though the men in po