Islamic Revival

Sharh At-Takattul Al-Hizbi  (Explanation of  Party Structuring ) by  Sheikh Mohammad Al-Hawarey  (rh).  This is a translation from Sheikh Hawarey's explanation of the unique book by Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabhani.  To access part 13 click here Alongside the Islamic, nationalistic and patriotic movements, communist movements were established and they were established upon the basis of matter. These movements followed the communist movements in Russia and were directed by them. Their method was destruction and subversion or sabotage. Its objective, other than establishing communism in the country, is to disrupt the western colonialism in favour of the eastern bloc by describing those who are in charge of the lands as agents of colonialism. It is not the place here to examine communism being established upon materialism or matter however I will briefly state that communism was established upon the Aqueedah of materialism i.e. that there is no deity (crea

Bismillahi Al-Rahman AlRaheem The Answer to the Question Regarding the Hadeeth: «.... وَمَنْ مَنَعَهَا فَإِنَّا آخِذُوهَا وَشَطْرَ مَالِهِ»  “….Whoever prevented it then we will take it plus half of his wealth” To: Duaa AlFurqan (Translated) Question: Our Dear Ameer, Assalamu alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, may Allah give victory through you. It is mentioned in the book, The Funds in the Khilafah State (Al-Amwal), on the subject of fines, page 104 (English edition), “Similarly, a fine is taken from the abstainer of paying Zakat half of his wealth as chastisement above the Zakat obliged upon him, due to the Prophet (saw) saying: «وَمَنْ مَنَعَهَا فأنا آخذها وشطر ماله» “….Whoever prevented it then I will take it plus half of his wealth” narrated by Abu Dawood and Ahmad). It appears from what is stated that the adopted opinion is the permissibility of imposing fine on the abstainer of paying Zakat as a chastising punishment “Ta’ziria”, desp

Bismillahi Al-Rahman AlRaheem Answers to the Questions: 1. Ruling related to Covering the Feet 2. Statement of Sultan of Brunei that He Intends to Implement the Shariah To Ahmad Uais Question:  Asalamu Alaikum our honourable Sheikh, Please when you have time, could you answer my questions? Barak Allah feek. First Question: From the book An-Nitham Al-Ijtima’i fil Islam [The Social System in Islam] 1. It is mentioned in the book on page 50 (English version)… “And there is no need to cover the feet since they are already covered”. Does this statement mean that it is not an obligation to wear something that covers the Awra(feet) underneath the public life dress (Jilbab)? 2. On page 50 in the same book (English version)… “Because the loose and draping dress down to the feet is an obligation”. The word “to” does it not indicate that the feet are not included to be covered by the Jilbab? From the linguistic sense, otherwise the previous paragraph confirms th