Islamic Revival

Free Naveed Butt Eight long months after the last hearing, a hearing at the Secretariat of the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances took place yesterday, 26 May 2015, regarding the abduction of the Official Spokesman of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Pakistan, Naveed Butt, who was kidnapped by agency thugs on 11 May 2012. The judge condemned the agencies for their false story that Naveed was killed in a drone attack in the tribal regions that was carried in an agency-inspired newspaper piece in July 2013. Hizb ut-Tahrir condemns this lowly tactic of the Raheel-Nawaz regime to persist in hiding behind falsehood, in order to deflect the immense pressure upon it for the release of Naveed Butt. It is known that Naveed was kidnapped in front of witnesses by the thugs of the regime, outside of his home, having returned there with his children from their school. This was after months of the agencies hunting him here and there, inquiring after him and issuing threats through any channel

Question: Assalaam Alaikum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakatahu, I would like to raise a question in relation to land, which is: What is the difference between the land in which the title and benefit is for the individual, and the land in which benefits are for the individual and its title for the state? May Allah reward you. From: Umm Musab Al Jaabari Answer: Wa Alaikum Assalaam Wa Ramatullah Wa Barakaatuhu There is no difference between the ‘Ushri and Kharaji land, they are similar except in two aspects: The owner of the ‘Ushri land owns the land itself and benefit, and the owner of the Kharaji land owns only its benefit and does not own its title. As a result of this, the owner of the ‘Ushri land if s/he wants to endow the land s/he owns, he can do it any times he wants, because he owns its property that is its neck. As if the owner of the Kharaji wants to endow the land that he owns he cannot, because the Endowment (الوقف) requires for the one who wants to endow it, tha

Question: Assalamu alaikum, bless you our Sheikh and Ameer and may we blessed with you, the Answer had the following sentence: “As it has legalized discretionary penalty and showed the details of its rulings and its types”, so what are these details of its rulings and types? From Naser Rida Mohammad Othman Answer: Your question is about a text that came from an answered question dated 02/01/2015, being: “As for the discretionary penalties, which are punishments on sins that the Shari’ didn’t specify for them any set punishment, but it was left to be decided by the Imam or the judge… they are rules of the method, and since the Shari’ didn’t specify the punishment, this doesn’t mean at all that it has not placed the method of executing the Shariah rulings when punishing those who do not commit to them discretionally,  as it has legalized discretionary penalties and showed the details of its rulings and its types … and it left to the Imam only to choose among the types of