Skip to main content

Q&A: Selling the security upon the debtors inability to pay

The following is a translation from Arabic.

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Question: I have known people to take as security/guarantee against a debt given to a debtor, if the debtor does not pay back the debt within a pre-agreed time, the creditor has the security which is a guarantee against the debt and in most cases the security is much more expensive and even many times the amount of the debt itself. What is the Shari’ah rule? Is it allowed under the Shari’ah to give or take loans against such security?

Answer:

It is allowed for a creditor to keep a security as guarantee of repayment against a loan that he gives to a debtor. It is reported by Muslim on the authority of ‘Aisha (r.a) about the Prophet (saw) that:

«اشترى رسول الله r من يهودي طعاماً بنسيئة فأعطاه درعاً له رهناً»
"The Prophet (saw) bought foodstuff from a Jew on deferred payment and pawned his shield to him as guarantee of payment."

But the creditor keeps the mortgage (pawn) only as a security against the inability of the debtor for repayment and the security remains the property of its owner (the debtor) because the Prophet (saw) said:

«لا يُغلَق الرهن من صاحبه الذي رهنه»
"The mortgage (security) is not to be denied to its owner who gives it to the creditor as guarantee." (Reported by Shafa’ee on the authority of Sa’eed ibn Mussayyib (r.a).

It implies that the creditor does not become the owner of the security, but he only keeps it as security against the loan and in case the debtor is unable to repay the loan, the security should be sold to recover the loan amount and return the rest of the amount realised by its sale to its owner i.e. the debtor.

The details are as follows: On the maturity of the loan period, the creditor (holding the security) calls on the debtor to pay back the debt. If the debtor has the money to back the loan, he clears the loan and the security is returned back to him (the debtor). But if the debtor does not have sufficient money to pay back the loan in full or part, then it becomes incumbent upon the debtor to sell the security (mortgage) with the permission of the creditor and first of all clear the loan amount and then keep the rest of the amount realised by the sale of the mortgage.

From this it becomes clear that in case of the inability of the debtor to repay the loan, it is not allowed for the creditor to seize the security (mortgage) and become its owner. Similarly he is not allowed to sell the security (mortgage) by himself except by order of a judicial court which will force the debtor to sell the security in order to repay the loan. This is because the security remains the property of the debtor as stated by the Prophet (saw):

«لا يُغلَق الرهن من صاحبه الذي رهنه»
"The mortgage (security) is not to be denied to its owner who gives it to the creditor as guarantee."

It is therefore the debtor who sells the security and repays the loan, and if he refuses, the ruler enforces the law and makes him sell the security to first repay the loan and then retain the rest of the amount realised by its sale for himself i.e. the debtor.

Shawwal 5th, 1428 A.H
October 16th, 2007 C.E

Arabic Source: Website of Sheikh Ata Abu Rashta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran