Skip to main content

Q&A: Custom Duties in the Islamic State

Question:
Assalamu Alaikum, it was mentioned in the book, The System of Islam, that the State collected the necessary funds for its expenditures according to the Shari'ah, it was also mentioned that it collects customs duties in its capacity as the supervisor over domestic and foreign trade.
So to what extent is this compatible with your attack to the tariffs policy of today, in reference to the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم
«لا يدخل الجنة صاحب مكس»
"The tax-collector will not enter Paradise" ?
And does domestic trade mean that the state imposes tariffs on trade made between the Wilayat of the Islamic State itself?
From Sameh Rayhan Abu Maysara

Answer:
Wa Alaikum Assalam Wa Rahmatullah Wa Barakatuh
- The hadith of Al-Maks (imposing customs duties/tax), was narrated by Al-Hakim in Al-Mustadrak by the two Sahih, and he said about it "Hadith Sahih according to Muslim and they did not narrate it" its text is: Narrated Uqbah ibn Amir: I heard the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم as saying: «لَا يَدْخُلُ صَاحِبُ مَكْسٍ الْجَنَّةَ» "He who imposes maks (custom duty) would not enter Paradise", the Hadith refers to the residents of the State, Muslims and non-Muslims (Ahl ul-Dhimma), collecting customs duties from them on their trade is not allowed, they trade and no customs duties is taken from them, whether it be between the Wilayat of the Islamic State or in the domestic trade, or whether it be between the Islamic State and the world, i.e. the foreign trade... so customs duties is not taken from the traders of the Islamic State, Muslims and non-Muslims... this is confirmed by what the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم stipulated in his letters to those who become Muslim but do not pay the tithe, i.e. the tithes on customs is not taken from them for trade:
- Abu Ahmad Hameed bin Mokhled bin Qutaiba bin Abdullah Al-Khursani, known as Ibn Zunjaweih (Died on 251 AH), narrated in his book, Al-Amwal, that the Prophet of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم wrote a book to Thaqeef upon their embracing to Islam, which mentioned: Humaid narrated to us... that 'Urwah bin Az-Zubayr said: This is the book from the Prophet of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم to Thaqeef: «بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ، هَذَا كِتَابٌ مِنْ مُحَمَّدٍ النَّبِيِّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لِثَقِيفٍ... وَلَا يُعْشَرُونَ...»، "In the Name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Beneficent, this is a book from Muhammad the Prophet and Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم to Thaqeef... and they shall not be levied on...", i.e. no 'Ushr customs would be imposed on their trades."
- Ibn Shabba narrated in the book, History of Madinah, that the Prophet of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم wrote a book to the Christians of Najran as Ahl ul-Dhimma that no customs shall be imposed on their trades.. it was mentioned in it: Abu Al-Waleed reported to us... Abu Al-Fath reported, that the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم made a treaty with the people of Najran, and wrote to them a book: «بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ، هَذَا كِتَابُ مُحَمَّدٍ النَّبِيِّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ لِأَهْلِ نَجْرَانَ إِذَا كَانَ حُكْمُهُ عَلَيْهِمْ... وَلَا يُعْشَرُونَ» "In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Beneficent. This is what Muhammad, the Prophet and God's Messenger, has written down for the people of Najran when he has the authority over them... and they shall not be levied on". i.e. no 'Ushr customs shall be imposed on the trade of non-Muslims (Ahl ul-Dhimma), this is because the Muslims made a treaty with the Christians of Najran as Ahl ul-Dhimma as evident by what was mentioned in the book "إِذَا كَانَ حُكْمُهُ عَلَيْهِمْ..." "when he has the authority over them...", i.e. the authority of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم.
- Abu Ubaydah narrated in "Al-Amwal" that 'Abdurrahman Ibn Ma'qal reported: "I asked Ziyad Ibn Hadeer: 'Whom did you use to levy?' He replied: 'We never used to levy a Muslim or a covenanter.' So I said: "then whom did you levy?" He replied: 'The belligerent traders, for they used to levy us when we went to them on business.'
• Therefore, the trader who is a citizen of the Islamic State, whether they be a Muslim or a Dhimmi, no customs duty shall be taken from them...
• As for the belligerent trader, the Shari'ah rule is to impose upon him the same levy imposed by his country upon the State's traders... 'Abu Ubayd reported in "Al-Amwal" "I asked: 'On whom did you use to levy 'Ushr (tithe) on then?' He said: 'The traders from the belligerent people, just as they used to levy (the tithe) on us when we went to them with our trade.', and as Abu Qudamah mentioned in his book "Al-Mughni" that Abu Majlaz Laahiq Ibn Hameed said: "They said to 'Umar: 'How much should we take from the belligerent people if they came to our land?' He asked: 'How much do they take from you?' They said: 'The 'Ushr (tithe).' He said: 'So take the same from them.'
In conclusion:
• Customs duties are not imposed on the traders of the Islamic State, whether the trader is a Muslim or a Dhimmi.
• Customs duties are imposed on the covenant trader in accordance with the foreign trade clauses of the treaty which the State has signed with them.
• Customs duties are imposed on the belligerent states the same levy they impose on our traders.
• As for the warring belligerent states "us and them are in a state of war", their traders are prevented from entering our lands because the relationship with them is a real war relationship.
Your brother,
Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah
16 Rabii' Al-Awwal 1435 AH
17 January 2014 CE
The link to the answer from the Ameer's Facebook page:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran