The following is the translation of an Arabic leaflet issued at the time of Sheikh Taqiuddin an-Nabhani.
Revival is the intellectual elevation.
While the economical elevation is not a revival. An evidence of that is Kuwait which is
economically much more elevated than some of the European states like Sweden , Holland and Belgium : Yet
Sweden, Holland
and Belgium
are elevated and Kuwait
is not. The ethical elevation is not a revival as well. An evidence of that is
that Madina today is superior to any country in the world ethically (morally),
yet it is not elevated. Thus revival is the intellectual elevation.
But this revival could be true (proper)
revival or untrue. So America ,
Europe and Russia are revived countries, but
their revival is incorrect. Because it is not established on a spiritual
foundation, since the true revival is the intellectual revival which is
established on the spiritual foundation. If the intellectual elevation is not
based on the spiritual foundation then it is not a revival but an incorrect
one. Thus there is not any true revival except that based on the foundation of
the Islamic thought, i.e. except the Islamic revival, because it is alone the
intellectual elevation based on the spiritual foundation.
The way to initiate this revival is to
establish the ruling (government) upon a thought, not upon systems and laws and
legislation. Establishing the state upon canons and laws will not create a
revival, on the contrary it will be deluded and a distraction from the revival.
Revival will not occur unless the ruling and authority is established upon a
thought, then the daily solutions (treatments) of life's problems emanate from
this thought; that is the systems and legislation and laws emanate from it. So
when Europe revived this was upon a thought
which was the detachment of the religion from the State, adding the liberties
(freedoms) as well. The revival of Russia was based on a thought,
which was materialism and the materialistic evolution, that is the transference
of things (naturally) from one situation to a better situation. So Russia
established the ruling (government) on this thought in 1917 and thus revived.
When Arabs revived they also revived on the Islamic thought which the Prophet
(SAW) brought as a message from Allah (SWT), and established the ruling and
authority (sultan) upon it. So the revival occurred to the Arabs when they
embraced it and established the ruling (government) upon it. All this is
(decisive) evidence that the way for initiating the revival is establishing the
ruling upon a thought.
The evidence that establishing the ruling
on systems and legislation does not initiate revival is what Mustafa Kamal made
in Turkey where he established the ruling (government) on systems and canons to
create a revival. So he adopted the Western systems and laws and started to
implement them, and implemented them actually by force, but he did not create a
revival, and accordingly Turkey
did not revive; rather it declined from the level which it held before. Look at
Turkey
nowadays, it is one of the most declined countries. While Lenin who came in the
same period in which Mustafa Kamal came managed to elevate Russia
effectively, and look at it today as one of the strongest states (N.B. before
its recent collapse). The reason for that is that Lenin established the ruling
on a thought which is the communist thought. From this thought the solutions of
the daily issues emanated, i.e. the systems and the canons. That is to say, he
started to treat the problems by laws adopted from the thought, upon which he
established the ruling. Therefore Lenin established the ruling in Russia in 1917
upon a thought thus he revived Russia .
And Mustafa Kamal established the ruling in 1924 upon systems and legislation
to revive Turkey
but he failed, rather it declined. Establishing the government upon the systems
and legislation was the reason that prevented Turkey from revival because it was
deluded with it.
The most recent example of this is what: Jamal
Abdul Nasser has done in Egypt .
Since 1952 he established the government on systems and legislation. At the
beginning he established it upon hanging the ruling system by replacing the
monarchical system with the republican system and upon distributing the farming
lands. Then he moved further to adopt social systems of what is called the
state socialism, but he did not initiate a revival. On the contrary, Egypt nowadays
from intellectual, economic and political aspects is more declined than it was
before 1952, i.e. before the military coup. When comparing its members of
parliament today, i.e. the National Council, with its parliamentary members
before 1952 from the angle of their intellectual and political capability, the
intellectual and political difference appears quite clear. The situation in Egypt prevents
the revival, because establishing the ruling upon the systems and legislation
does not initiate revival. What creates the revival is only establishing the
ruling upon a thought.
However, establishing the government upon
a thought does not mean to make a military coup and seize the power and
establish the government upon the thought, since this will not found a revival,
and moreover is unlikely to settle in power. Rather it means to explain to the
Ummah or the stronger group of the Ummah the thought upon which it is intended
to revive the Ummah, and direct itself in the battle of life on the basis of
this thought; then the government is established upon this thought by the Ummah
and thus the revival occurs surely. So the essence of the revival is not
seizing the power, rather it is unifying the Ummah on the thought and making it
direct its life on this thought. Then the power is taken and the government is
established upon that thought. Seizing the power is not an aim in itself, and
it is incorrect to be an aim. Rather, it is a method for the revival by
establishing the government upon the thought. Therefore the ruling is taken to
establish it upon the thought, in order that the revival ours. The proper
example for that is that which the Prophet (SAW) did. When he was sent by Allah
the Supreme with the Message of Islam, he invited the people to the Islamic
creed, i.e. to the thought. And when he gathered the people of the Madina, Al
Aws and Al Khazraj, on the Islamic creed, i.e. on the thought, and made them
direct their life according to it, he took the ruling (power or authority) in
the Madina and established upon the Islamic creed and started to say: "I
was ordered to fight against the people until they say: La ilaha illa Allah,
Muhammadur Rasool Allah. If they said it, they protected of me their blood and
property except for the right upon their property." Thus he started to
call for the thought, and accordingly the revival occurred in Madina, then in
the Arabs, then in every people who entered Islam, i.e. embraced the thought
and had the authority which takes care of its affairs established upon it.
Today, the Islamic Ummah in all its
countries is undoubtedly declined, and it was trying to revive for more than
two hundred years, and it failed to revive until now. The reason is because
their governments are built on systems and legislation. And the ruling whether
established on non-Islamic systems, i.e. kufr systems as it is the case in most
of the Islamic countries, or established on Islamic systems and divine rules as
was the case in some few countries as Yemen before the revolution of As-Sallal,
they are all declined, and have no revival. The reason of this is that the
ruling is established on systems not on a thought. Even establishing the ruling
upon Islamic systems and divine rules does not create a revival. That which
initiates the revival is establishing the ruling upon the Islamic thought, i.e.
upon the Islamic creed. So establishing the State upon "La ilaha illa
Allah, Muhammadur Rasool Allah" is that which creates the revival. But
establishing it upon the Mazhab of Abu Hanifa or upon the book of Tahtaoui or
upon the divine rules does not create a revival. Instead, it must be
established upon "La ilaha illa Allah, Muhammadur Rasool Allah", then
after that the divine rules are adopted in their capacity as commands from
Allah, and they are implemented as His orders and prohibitions, not because
they are good and beneficial or because they contain a benefit or the like.
Rather because they are revealed from Allah, that is derived from "La
ilaha illa Allah, Muhammadur Rasool Allah", and by such the revival
occurs.
So in order to revive the Islamic Ummah
today, she must make the Islamic creed the basis which directs its life, and
establish the ruling and authority upon it, and treat the daily affairs by the
rules which emanate from this creed, i.e. by the divine rules in their capacity
as prescriptions from Allah only not due to any other description. Thus the
revival definitely occurs, rather the correct revival not any revival. Thus the
Islamic Ummah returns back to hold the seat of the highest glory and to take
the initiative to the world again.
This is the way to revive the Islamic
Ummah truly, and along this path Muslims have to proceed.
Comments