Question:
Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakaatuhu
In the book Political Concepts, under
the chapter "Motives Behind Global Struggle" on page 30 English version
(page 54 Arabic version), the first line on the first paragraph
mentions: "Since the dawn of history to the day of judgement, the
motives of the nations for global struggle are either pride and the
desire for sovereignty or the pursuance of material interests."
(Then on the same page on the paragraph before last, on line 15 of the
Arabic version) Then it mentions on page 31 of the English version in
the first full paragraph: "Colonialism in all its forms is the most dangerous materialistic motive of the global struggle."
The Question is in the first paragraph,
motives of the nations for global struggle are summarized and restricted
to two only, not more, there is no third, and this is when it stated: "motives of the nations for global struggle ...does not extend beyond these two motives"
but in the second paragraph it mentioned a third motive that was not
mentioned in the first paragraph which is "colonialism". The question
posed in a different manner: Are the motives of the nations for global
struggle two or three? Because one who reads both paragraphs finds
contradiction and difference between them, so how can they be
reconciled? Because if the motives of the nations for global struggle
were two why then mention a new third one which is colonialism?
From Ahmad Fuad Fuad
Answer:
Wa Alaikum Assalaam wa Rahmatullah wa Barakaatuhu
There is no contradiction between what
was mentioned in the book Political Concepts, at the beginning of page
54 of the Arabic version (on page 30 English version), that the motives
of the nations for global struggle are restricted to two: the desire for
sovereignty and pride and the pursuance of material interests, and what
came later on the page, that the motive of colonialism in all its forms
is one of the most dangerous motives of the nations for global
struggle. This is because the colonialism motive comes under the
pursuance of material interest; colonialism is the method of the
capitalist ideology to achieve material interest according to their
criteria which is "interest". This means that colonization is due to
another motive which is the pursuance of material interest, and it is
not a new motive separate to the two mentioned at the beginning of the
page. If you take a closer look, you will notice that it mentions
another issue that can be taken as another motive... but the text
referred it to the motive of the desire of domination and pride, on the
same page it mentions the following: "The urge to stop other
countries growing in strength as happened against Napoleon, the Islamic
state and Nazi Germany is a desire motivated by sovereignty, because it
is a stand against those powers seeking to be sovereign."
Similarly, just as it did not consider
the motive of limiting the growth of strength of another nation as a
separate motive to the two mentioned, likewise colonialism is not
considered a separate motive to the two mentioned, because the two
mentioned motives are the main motives that come under other related
matters.
Your brother,
Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah
17 Muharram 1436 AH
10/11/2014 CE
The link to the answer from the Ameer's Facebook page:
Comments