From The Thinking Muslim
Our guest this week is Ustadh Iyad Hilal. He is an Islamic scholar and is soon to publish the fourth edition of his popular Usul al-Fiqh book, aimed at English speaking Muslims. He has spent years studying the topic of moon-sighting and argues that in origin a lot of the debates about what constitutes sighting have been subject to differences between the classical scholars. To insist on one way, as some Islamic groups do, in the absence of a caliphal authority that resolves disputes, comes from a shallow understanding of the lawfulness of difference of opinion in Islam. He argues that it is perfectly natural for there to be differences of interpretation of texts and that the correct way is to accept this difference with adab and civility. In other words, there is no problem in having differences as long as it is based on a sincere reading of the Islamic sources of law.
He talks through all the evidences on the matter and discusses issues of using calculations, local vs global sighting, what is a witness and following countries such as Saudi Arabia exclusively in determining Ramadan.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/7JXeKCaGWK1sMNLbrrn3kN
Comments