Skip to main content

Q&A: Is there a Clear Statement Where Taqleed for more than One Mujtahed is Forbidden

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Question & Answer:

Is there a Clear Statement Where Taqleed for more than One Mujtahed is Forbidden

Question:
Is there a clear statement for the issue where taqleed for more than one mujtahed is forbidden? Then how will I know that this is one issue or more? May Allah reward you.

Answer:

In al-Shakhsiyya Volume One in the chapter: Moving (tanaqqul) from one mujtahid to another, [p. 234-5 (Arabic) and p.188 (English edition)], the following is mentioned:

"But it should be clear that the issue where it is permissible for him to leave the ruling that he used to follow to another ruling, it is required that the issue is separated from any other issues, and that leaving it is not consequent to affecting other provisions of legitimacy. However, if it was related to another issue, then it's not permissible for him to leave it until he leaves all the issues related to it because it it considered all one issue. For example, it was a condition for another ruling or one pillar of the pillars of a complete work, as praying, making wudoo', and the pillars of prayer. It's not permissible to those who follow al-Shafi'i, for example, to follow Abu Hanifa in his opinion that touching a woman does not break the wudoo' and continue praying following the Shafi'i mazhab. It is not permissible to follow who says that moving as much as you want during prayer does not invalidate the prayer or who say reading al-Fatiha is not one of the pillars of prayer, and then continue praying following who says that moving a lot invalidates the prayer or reading al-Fatiha is one of the pillars of prayer. The ruling that is permissible to leave is the one that does not affect other actions that are performed within other provisions of legitimacy." It is clear from all that the definition of an issue depends on its separation from others, and that it's not consequent to affecting other provisions of legitimacy, so that it won't be a pillar, a condition of establishment, or a condition of validity for another rulings, because at this time it won't be separated from others.
And we can clarify this more as follows:

Defining the issue: what is meant by the issue is every action or group of actions that nothing depend on it for its truthfulness. Whereas part of the issue is every action that is inevitable to achieve its validity as conditions and pillars.

Examples:
  • Al-Wudu': actions where others depend for their validity on them because the validity of prayer depends on wudu'. For that, the wudu' is not an issue, according to the definition, but it is considered a part of the prayer that is inevitable to achieve its validity.
  • Prayer: actions that no other actions depend on it for their validity, so it is an issue. Everything that is inevitable to achieve its validity is considered a part of prayer, such as: the pillars, and the conditions of validity like purity (tahara) and facing the Qibla.
  • Intention in fasting: an action on which the validity of another action depends on it, as the validity of fasting depends on the intention; for that, the intention is not an issue but part of another issue.
  • Fasting: an action that nothing depend on it for its validity, so it is an issue, and everything that is inevitable to achieve its validity is considered part of it, such as: the intention and refraining from things that break the fasting.
If somebody follows a Mujtahed in praying, then he should follow this Mujtahed in all its parts like wudu', purifying filthiness (tahara), Qibla, and the pillars of prayer. If somebody follows a Mujtahed in fasting, then he should follow this Mujtahed in all its parts like the intention, the wujoob of making it everyday or for the whole month, the timing of the intention during the day or at night, matters that void fasting, and the license when to break fasting. But it is permissible follow a Mujtahed in another issue.

This is as long as the person is a Muqaled (a learned follower), but whenever he has the capability to judge the evidences, it is permissible for him to abandon the Mujtahed that he followed and follow the strongest evidence.

I hope that I clarified this issue, and Allah is the Guide and Sustainer.

23 Shawwal 1433
09/06/2012

Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider ...

Authenticity of ahadith on tall buildings in Makkah?

Question Are these   ḥadith  sound? Are the references provided correct and accurate? When you see the belly of Makkah will be cleft open and through it will be dug out river-like passages (i.e. tunnels) (or water in the road to Makkah), and you see the buildings surpass its mountains, then take care (or beware, or a variant has: then know that the matter is at hand, or then understand that the time of trial (Judgment day) is near at hand). [Narrated by Al-Azraqi in the Book of reports about Makkah – Kitab Akhbaar Makkah, Hadiyth-1725; A specific Hadiyth (in fact several related-Hadiyths) which prophesizes about this Tower. Itha ra’aitun mecca bu’ijat katha’ima, wa ya-tasawa bunyanuha ru’usa jibaliha, faqad athalati as-Sa’atu. When you see Mecca, its mountain with holes (pierced through them), and its buildings reach its mountain tops, then as-Sa’ah (the Hour) has already cast its shadow. [Suyuti] So when you see in Makkah that channels have already been dug (or tunnels b...

The Shariah rules relating to mixing between the sexes

In Islam, the basic principle of the interaction between men and women is segregation. This means that in all areas of life and in all places whether private or public, contact between men and women is generally prohibited. Many evidences establish the principle of not mixing between the sexes, and there are many ahadith which clarify that this is the case in both public and private areas: Abu Hurairah reported that the Messenger of Allah said: "The best rows for the men are the first rows and the worst rows for them are the last rows. The best rows for the women are the last rows and the worst for them are the front rows." The last rows are the best for the women because they are farther away from the men as against the first rows that are nearest to men's rows. [This is related by the group except al-Bukhari]  In Abu Dawud, p.284, Hadith No. 4931, it is narrated upon the authority of Aisha (ra) that she said: "I used to play with my friends and whenever the P...