Skip to main content

Q&A: Is the Ummah ready to face the consequences of establishing Khilafah?

Question:
Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu
The respected scholar Ata Bin Khalil, after greeting,
All of us know that the Ummah today is closer than any other time to announce the Khilafah State, which will be covered by an urgent newsflash that we could hear any time by the will of Allah. But my question, depending on your location and knowledge of the current events, is the Islamic Ummah ready now for such a great thing, especially when we put into consideration that the tasks that follow establishing the state may be is much more difficult than the work to establish it, so is the Ummah ready to tolerate such consequences?
From: Yusuf Yusuf

Answer:
Wa Alaikum Assalam wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu
My brother, the issue is that Allah سبحانه وتعالى grants us victory, so that we can establish the Khilafah state. As to if the Ummah is ready to tolerate these consequences? Yes, and what is lacking is a pure pious leadership that leads it to the good deeds in the shade of the Khilafah Rashidah. Allah سبحانه وتعالى describes this Ummah,
كُنْتُمْ خير امة اخرجت للناس تأمرون بالمعروف وتنهون عن المنكر وتؤمنون بالله
"You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah."
(Al-Imran: 110)
Indeed, destructive cultures, void ideas, and dangerous concepts have dominated over our Ummah; moreover, the Islamic bond has weakened, and nationalistic and patriotic bonds have spread instead... But all of this is not what's deeply within the majority of the Ummah, but it floats on the surface because of the unjust rulers and the media that serves their interests. However, there are good deeds, and I guess that you follow the work of the Hizb and can see that the Khilafah has a public opinion now, and it has become obvious that the Khilafah has become a public demand after which calling for it used to be a shame!
O my brother, the vital nations even if they were subjected to factors of weakness and separation they would revolt. The crusaders have dwelled in our countries for 200 years, and in Jerusalem on its own about 90 years, then the Hiteen Battle occurred in Rabi' al-Akher 583 AH. Afterwards, liberating Jerusalem in Rajab 583 AH, then they expelled the crusaders the worst expulsion, after Salahuddin had removed the Fatimiyya in Egypt and fixed the bonds in the Abbasid Khilafah. As well as Tatars who destroyed Baghdad and killed the Khaleefah on 656 AH, so the Khilafah moved to Egypt, and after two years Ayn Jalout Battle occurred in 658 AH, and the Tatars were demolished.
Thus, o dear brother, restoring the Khilafah with its pure and pious leadership will restore the glory and conquests of the Ummah by the will of Allah.
May Allah bless you for your care and concern.
Your brother,
Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah
25th Muharram 1435 AH
28/11/2013 CE
Link to the answer from the Ameer's Facebook page:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran