Skip to main content

Members of groups being forbidden by their leadership to listen to others?

The following is the translation of an Arabic article.

An examination of the issue of listening

The need to examine the issue of listening has arisen because it has become known that some of the groups have distributed general instructions to their members not to discuss with certain people or to not discuss specific topics with the people etc. Is this action of theirs Halaal or Haraam?

The correct view is that this action of there is Haraam and cannot possibly be permissible under any circumstances. That is because in respect to every Shar’iy obligatory matter, its obligation is established only by the Daleel Ash-Shar’iy, except for listening because its obligation is established by the ‘Aql (mind) and the Shar’a. That is because if listening was not an obligation by the ‘Aql (mind or rationally), then the one who is called to Islaam and rejects or refuses to listen will meet Allah without sin. That is not correct and theoretically, in the least, that would make the messages of the Prophets a matter which hold no value, whilst the corruption of such a conclusion is an obviously known matter.

Allah Ta’Aalaa said:

وَإِنِّي كُلَّمَا دَعَوْتُهُمْ لِتَغْفِرَ لَهُمْ جَعَلُوا أَصَابِعَهُمْ فِي آذَانِهِمْ وَاسْتَغْشَوْا ثِيَابَهُمْ وَأَصَرُّوا وَاسْتَكْبَرُوا اسْتِكْبَارًا
And indeed, every time I invited them that You may forgive them, they put their fingers in their ears, covered themselves with their garments, persisted, and were arrogant with [great] arrogance (Nooh: 7).

Allah Ta’Aalaa has therefore reproached those who refused to listen to Sayyidinaa Nooh (‘Alaihi s-Salaam) and rebuked them for that. Similar to the people of Nooh is applied upon anyone who rejects or refuses to listen to any of the Prophets and there is no doubt that he is reprehensible before Allah Ta’Aalaa. Therefore, anyone who is called to good must listen to him and then if he is convinced he must follow him (in what he has said) and if he is not convinced them he leaves it.

However, when the person is a Muslim, and is called to that which is better than he is upon or more correct, he must listen and it is not Halaal for him to turn away in opposition, because that leads to making the matter of examining or searching for the strongest evidence hold no value, whilst nobody has said that. Therefore, whoever was a Muqallid (follower) of a Hukm Shar’iy derived from a particular Mujtahid and then a particular person from the people found fault in the opinion of the Mujtahid that he was following, he must listen to him, due to the possibility that the evidence that he has is stronger than the evidence he is upon or basing his following upon.

What some of the groups do in terms of forbidding its individuals from discussing with some of the people or discussing some subject areas, represents a matter which is not correct and they have no right to do that. If their action was permissible, then it would only be just to say that if any individual from the people said to them that they did not want to listen to them, he would have the right to do that, and that this is not condemnable in any way before Allah. That would mean, even if it was hypothetical, that the existence of these groups would hold no value and their commanding of the Ma’roof and forbidding of the Munkar would also hold no value.

That is whilst the groups themselves which distribute these general instructions related to this type of matter don’t say that. Rather, they regard it as obligatory upon the individual from the people to listen to them and what they carry in terms of good. Therefore, as they make it obligatory upon the people to listen to what they carry in terms of good, they don’t have the right themselves to not listen to others. If they were to do that, it would represent a matter that has no fairness in it, indeed it represents the very meaning of injustice or unfairness.  

It is therefore obligatory upon the individuals of any group to listen to others with open minds and hearts. Wisdom is the guide of the Muslim and he acquires it wherever he can find it. In addition to that, the reality of listening to others is that it keeps you within the picture and aware of the situation or condition of the Ummah whom these individuals are working amongst. Just as it makes them aware of their own situation or condition. If they were to refuse to listen that would then place them in one valley whilst their Ummah is in another, whilst they weave from their imaginations images or perceptions which they subsist upon although they have no real existence within the reality.

Sheikh Abu Islam Yusuf Shaqeero, Palestine 


Unknown said…
There are some people known for creating trouble. Or for slandering and creating discord r confusions. Advising our kids or brotehrs to reamin safe from them is not correct? At least that is what i understood from the article

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Authenticity of ahadith on tall buildings in Makkah?

Question Are these   ḥadith  sound? Are the references provided correct and accurate? When you see the belly of Makkah will be cleft open and through it will be dug out river-like passages (i.e. tunnels) (or water in the road to Makkah), and you see the buildings surpass its mountains, then take care (or beware, or a variant has: then know that the matter is at hand, or then understand that the time of trial (Judgment day) is near at hand). [Narrated by Al-Azraqi in the Book of reports about Makkah – Kitab Akhbaar Makkah, Hadiyth-1725; A specific Hadiyth (in fact several related-Hadiyths) which prophesizes about this Tower. Itha ra’aitun mecca bu’ijat katha’ima, wa ya-tasawa bunyanuha ru’usa jibaliha, faqad athalati as-Sa’atu. When you see Mecca, its mountain with holes (pierced through them), and its buildings reach its mountain tops, then as-Sa’ah (the Hour) has already cast its shadow. [Suyuti] So when you see in Makkah that channels have already been dug (or tunnels built), and you