Skip to main content

Through his statement Musharraf has confirmed American allegations of infiltration into Afghanistan

Musharraf’s statement that he has received reports that points to the possibility of certain retired ISI (Inter Services Intelligence) officers aiding Taliban, amounts to an explicit confirmation of American and Afghani allegations of Pakistan’s infiltration and interference in Afghanistan. Hence by authenticating American accusations, Musharraf has once again exposed his true face. If we assume that Musharraf’s statement did actually has some truth attached to it even then there is no possible rational explanation as to why it was felt necessary to confess on American national media? After all what national interest will be served through this blunder? Consequently the American government and its media will further increase pressure on Pakistan; basing their arguments on this very statement. And under the pretext of this so-called American pressure Musharraf will once again portray himself as “helpless” and “coerced” (Majboor) to detain retired and serving officers of the Pakistan Armed Forces. Musharraf’s treachery has become so open and has reached to such a blatantly absurd level that he cannot offer a single logical argument to justify his actions except repeating the mantra of “compulsion” (Mujboori). Hence after passing through Wana, the crusade that was waged in Afghanistan under the guise of “Pakistan first” will be extended to the whole of Pakistan. But unfortunately, in this battle − unlike Iraq and Afghanistan − not a single American soldier will be killed since, thanks to Musharraf, Pakistan’s armed forces, intelligence agencies and police will be the one conducting these operations. Moreover, this battle will not be just between administration and the people of Pakistan but it is feared that it will be a war among different institutions of the state. Musharraf’s current statement, like his previous statements, is precisely according to his policy of ‘waving the red rag to a bull’. This policy is also the central theme of Musharraf current book. This book is more of a charge-sheet against Pakistan and less of an autobiography of Musharraf. Globally, the book presents Pakistan’s distorted image as a country, which is the largest nuclear proliferator in the world as well as a country that is the biggest source of extremism and terrorism, which the West should be very cautious about. To make Pakistan a future target, these two charges were very essentials whose confession has been extracted from none other than the chief of the army staff and the president of the country himself. Pakistan is the strongest Muslim country in the Muslim Ummah and America fears that in the near future if the Khilafah is established here it will pose a major threat to the American hegemony. That is why America is wagging an intense criminal propaganda against Pakistan before the establishment of the Khilafah and Musharraf is her most important pawn in this project. O people of powerful and authority! Would you continue to permit this traitor to seriously harm the interest of Pakistan and the Muslims? Hasn’t the time come yet that you establish the Khilafah to liberate the Muslims from the slavery of the West and guide them to the honor and triumph they deserve?

Naveed Butt, Pakistan
2nd Oct, 2006


Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran