Skip to main content

Sanctity of Speech or Prophets


By Abu Anas

Egyptians and Libyans were enraged, last Tuesday, by an offensive and hateful US produced film that depicted Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in a degrading manner. In Egypt, protesters climbed over the US embassy in Cairo and teared the American flag, while in Libya, an angry and armed crowd surrounded the US embassy in Benghazi setting it on fire after throwing grenades and storming it with live bullets. The US Ambassador to Libya was killed in addition to three other foreign service personnel.1 Many Libyan security forces sacrificed their lives while trying to protect the embassy during the encounter.

This incident comes at a very delicate time when the US is trying to rebuild relations and trust with the Muslim world after the Arab revolutions. In the past, the Western-backed tyrants of the Middle East used to rule by an iron fist and would have crushed such protests, but today the Arab world went through a transformation that has set limits on these regimes. Especially the "liberal" Islamist governments, that were voted in recently, would encounter the wrath of the masses if they side with the insult of Islam. That is why the Brotherhood government in Egypt has condemned the US film and even called for a peaceful vigil in front of the same US embassy in Cairo. This constitutes the dilemma of the US foreign policy towards the Muslim world, which is a clash of values and ideals! 

While some Westerners might argue that these types of films are protected by the freedom of speech in a civil democratic state, Muslims consider such portrayal of their Prophet as blasphemy. The world had witnessed, for the last ten years, the worldwide demonstrations against the Danish cartoons and the uniform response across the Islamic world. As a case in point, when a protester in Cairo was asked about free speech, he replied, "freedom of religion is more important than freedom of expression"1, which is a rejection for the sanctity of this liberal and secular value. This clearly shows that Muslims oppose the real notion of a civil democratic state which would approve of the disdain of religion. In reality, what Muslims are demanding for, through the Arab Spring, are the rights to freely choose their rulers and to have social, economical and political justice based on the sacred teachings of their religion.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444017504577645681057498266.html

Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran